Babar Ali v. The State Of West Bengal

07.01.2025 sdas Rejected C.R.M. (A) No. 38 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Bhagwangola Police Station Case No. 423 of 2024 dated 18.08.2024 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/303(2)/ 103(1)/61/3(5) of the BNS.

And In Re : Babar Ali ...... petitioner Mr. Navanil De Ms. Monami Mukherjee .....for the petitioner Mr. Bibhaswan Bhattacharya Mr. Mainak Gupta ..... for the State 1.

Heard the learned Counsels for the parties.

2.

We have considered the materials on record.

Petitioner is named in the FIR. Statements of witnesses before Magistrate implicate the petitioner in the alleged crime. Discharge of one of the FIR named accused was in view of collection of exonerative evidence in his favour and does not apply to the petitioner. Accordingly, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

3. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)