Istak Seikh @ Istak Sekh v. State Of West Bengal

28.01.2022 Serial no.56 an (Through Video Conference) CRM (DB) 33 of 2022 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bankura Police Station Case No. 97 of 2021 dated 11.06.2021 under Sections 395/412 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act corresponding to G.R. Case No. 589 of 2021.

-AndIn the matter of : Istak Seikh @ Istak Sekh ... ...Petitioner Mr. Kallol Mondal ... ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury Mr. Sandip Chakraborty ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the other co-accused were granted bail by the coordinate benches. Although, the petitioner was identified in the T. I. Parade, the identification was made by the Police Personnel when the petitioner was in custody. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that apart from the fact that the petitioner was identified in the T. I. Parade, stolen articles being jewelleries were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner in the case and considering the fact that stolen articles were recovered from the house of the petitioner and considering the fact that the petitioner was identified in the T. I. Parade, we are unable to grant bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for bail is rejected.

CRM (DB) 33 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)