U.T.I Bank Ltd. v. Parul Sen

22.06.2022 SL No.41 Court No.8 (gc) FA 329 of 2009 With CAN 1 of 2006 (Old No: CAN 1573 of 2006) U.T.I. Bank Ltd.

Vs.

Parul Sen The department has reported that no fresh Vakalatnama in connection with the present appeal filed on behalf of the appellant or the respondent.

The parties are not represented nor any accommodation is prayed for on their behalf. Even on the earlier occasion, that is, 15th June, 2022, the parties were not represented.

In view of our earlier order dated 15th June, 2022, the appeal being FA 329 of 2008 and the application being CAN 1 of 2006 (Old No: CAN 1573 of 2006) stand dismissed for default.

All interim order, if any, stand vacated.

L.C.R., if arrived, shall immediately be sent down by the department to the appropriate Court.

The name of the advocate-on-record for the appellants has been correctly printed in the cause title. (Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)