Binapani Halder v. State Of West Bengal

25.01.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 48 of 2022 (through Video conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Dhaniakhali Police Station Case No. 268 of 2021 dated 18.12.2021 under Sections 498A/307/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Binapani Halder ...... petitioner Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury Mr. Argha Das Mr. Abhishek Bose ....for the petitioner Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee Ms. Debjani Sahu ....for the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). Considering the gravity of the offence and considering the involvement of the petitioner therein as appearing from the case diary, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional court on every date fixed and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)