Milan @ Milon Ansari v. State Of West Bengal

06.01.2023 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 36 of 2023 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection Palashipara Police Station Case No. 337 of 2022 dated 21.09.2022 under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Milan @ Milon Ansari ...... petitioner Ms. Minoti Gomes Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee ....for the petitioner Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra ....for the de-facto complainant Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Aniket Mitra ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

State and the de-facto complainant are represented. Learned advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant submits that, the de-facto complainant returned to her matrimonial home and is presently staying therein. In view of the stand taken by the de-facto complainant, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)