Mujibar Halsana v. State Of West Bengal

CRM No.187 of 2021 20.01.21 (S.R.) Sl.208 Ct.28 In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Palashipara Police Station Case No.233 of 2020 dated 29.08.2020 under Sections 21(c)/29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; And In re: Mujibar Halsana ... petitioner.

Mr. Sushanta Chakraborty ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Binay Panda Mr. S. Bhakat ...for the State.

Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. No contraband substance was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and as such, his custodial detention is not necessary. Mr. Panda, learned advocate appearing for the State submits that contraband substance was recovered from the house of the petitioner and there are records disclosing his involvement in the alleged offence. Having heard the learned advocates and considering the materials in the case diary, the nature of allegations and the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail being CRM No.187 of 2021, is dismissed.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)