← Library
Calcutta High CourtCO/40/2022disposed

Shyamsunder Ghosh v. Haru Chakraborty

2022-04-28Hon'Ble Justice Subhasis Dasgupta2 pages

AG 28.04.

M Ct C.O. 40 of 2022 Sri Shyamsunder Ghosh Vs Sri Haru Chkraborty Mr. Kushal Chatterjee, ... For the petitioner. Mr. Abir Lal Chakraborty, A direction to secure expeditious disposal of pending interlocutory applications, like, application for temporary injunction, and application under Sections 7(1) and 7 (2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, is the ultimate relief sought for in this case.

Admittedly, this is a suit for eviction. It was instituted in the year 2019.

The only contention expressed by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner is against the delay caused in the disposal of pending interlocutory applications.

In view of the nature of the order proposed to be made in the case, no prior notice is considered to be necessary.

Service upon the opposite party is thus dispensed with.

Accordingly, learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 6th Court, Howrah, in Title Suit No.1403 of 2019 is requested to ensure expeditious disposal of

pending interlocutory applications referred hereinabove, one after another, providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to either of the parties to this case, but without granting unnecessary adjournment, unless it is extremely unavoidable.

Petitioner is directed to make communication of this order to the learned court below as well as to the learned advocate appearing in the court below for the opposite party and the opposite party.

With this observation and direction, the revisional application stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertakings.

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J)