Sachin Sarkar And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

25.01.2022 Serial no.42 Aloke (Through Video Conference) Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 99 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 05.01.2022 in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No. 363 of 2021 dated 11.07.2021 under Sections 323/325/307/354/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Sachin Sarkar & Ors.

... ...Petitioners Mr. Asraf Mandal, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. S.S. Imam, Advocate Mr. R. Jana, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated. The de facto complainant is an agent of a cheat fund company. The petitioners were demanding the money from the de facto complainant.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report. He submits that the police filed charge-sheet.

Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and with a further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the

Court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below on every date fixed for hearing. The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM (A) 99 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)