← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/79/2022dismissed

Amari Sardar @ Amri Sardar v. State Of West Bengal

2022-01-28Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De1 pages

28.01.2022 Serial no.93 Aloke (Through Video Conference) Ct. No. 29 CRM (DB) 79 of 2022 In re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 07.01.2022 in connection with Deganga Police Station FIR No. 356 of 2021 dated 03.07.2021 under Sections 498A/406/307/326 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Amari Sardar @ Amri Sardar ... ...Petitioner Ms. Piyali Mukherjee, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. P.K. Datta, ld. APP Mr. Santanu Deb Roy, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioner seeks bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that considering the period of detention of the petitioner and considering the fact that police filed charge-sheet, prayer for bail of the petitioner should be granted. She contends that the victim set herself on fire and told the police about the same.. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the victim. He submits that the victim named the husband, mother-in-law and uncle-inlaw as the persons involved in the incident. It appears from the statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the victim that the petitioner named the mother-in-law as one of the persons involved in the incident.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are unable to grant bail to the petitioner.

Consequently, CRM (DB) 79 of 2022 is rejected. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)