← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/80/2024allowed

Rosel Sk @ Sahadul Sk v. State Of West Bengal

2024-01-15Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

15.01.2024 Item No.4 Ct. No. 29 CHC Allowed C.R.M.(A) 80 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 743 of 2023 dated 01.11.2023 under Sections 341/325/308 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In the matter of : Rosel Sk @ Sahadul Sk ...... petitioner Mr. Arnab Chatterjee, Ms. Poulami Bose, Ms. Dhanasree Biswas ....for the petitioner Mrs. Sonali Das ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

The injured was assaulted by a blunt rod and suffered four cut injuries over the scalp of 2 to 6 c.m. Injury was not classified as grievous hurt.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Investigating

Officer once in a month till the conclusion of investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. CRM(A) 80 of 2024 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)