Prasanta Das And ANR v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

M. 254 16.04.2024 AGM In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side W.P.A 528 of 2024 Prasanta Kumar Das & Anr.

-versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. Aparajita Mondal.

Mr. Biplab Adak.

...For the Petitioners.

Mr. Amal Kumar Sen. AGP Mr. Lal Mohan Basu.

...For the State.

Ms. Varsha Roy.

...For the Respondent No.10.

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today is taken on record.

The petitioners complain of illegal and unauthorized construction at the behest of the respondent no. 10. Objection filed against such unauthorized construction is alleged to be kept pending.

Learned advocate appearing for the private respondent denies the allegation of the petitioners. It has been submitted that construction is being made in accordance with the plan sanctioned.

As it appears that the representation of the petitioner objecting to the illegal and unauthorized

construction is pending consideration at the end of the respondent authorities, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of by directing the respondent no. 9 to consider and dispose of the representation made by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties including the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order. The said respondent shall pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to all the necessary parties including the petitioner immediately thereafter. A spot inspection shall be conducted to ascertain the nature and extent of unauthorized construction. In the event the aforesaid respondent is of the considered opinion that the construction has been made either in violation of the plan sanctioned or devoid the sanction plan, then necessary steps shall be taken to deal with such unauthorized construction, in accordance with law.

The aforesaid respondent shall restrict the consideration of the representation with regard to unauthorized construction only and not enter into or decide any private dispute of the parties regarding right, title and interest in respect of the aforesaid land. It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner and all points are left open to be decided by the aforesaid respondent at the time of consideration of the representation of the petitioner.

The petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the representation dated 20th November, 2023 to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of the Court.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

( Amrita Sinha, J.)