Roys Institute Of Competitive Examination Pvt Ltd v. Snigdhendu Mukhopadhayay And ANR
146-147 12.12.2024 Ct. No.22 pg.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CO 85 of 2023 Roy's Institute of Competitive Examination Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
Snigdhendu Mukhopadhyay & Anr.
with CO 2089 of 2023 Snigdhendu Mukhopadhyay Vs.
Roy's Institute of Competitive Examination Pvt. Ltd. (RICE) Mr. Rahul Karmakar Mr. Sounak Mukherjee ... For the petitioner in CO 85 of 2023 & opposite party in CO 2089 of 2023 Mr. Subhendu Bandyopadhyay Mr. Arindam Mitra ... For the opposite party no.2/LIC in CO 85 of 2023 Mr. Manabendra Nath Bandyopadhyay ... For the petitioner in CO 23 of 2023 & opposite party no.1 in CO 85 of 2023 In re: CO 85 of 2023 1.
This revisional application has been filed with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Money Execution Case No.23 of 2015 arising out of Money Suit No.158 of 2010 pending before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court at Barasat, North 24-Parganas.
2.
Though no direction is required to be made for service of notice upon the opposite parties, Mr. Subhendu Bandyopadhyay, learned counsel, has entered
appearance on behalf of Life Insurance Corporation of India, i.e., opposite party no.2 herein.
3.
Considering the nature of prayer, the instant revisional application, being CO 85 of 2023, is being disposed of with a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court, Barasat, North 24-Parganas, to dispose of the Money Execution Case No.23 of 2015, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order. 4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are at liberty to bring this order to the notice of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court, Barasat, North 24-Parganas, forthwith.
5.
All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
6.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities.
In re: CO 2089 of 2023 7.
Mr. Manabendra Nath Bandyopadhyay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has entered appearance after the dictation is completed in CO 85 of 2023 and prayed for an accommodation.
8.
Mr. Rahul Karmakar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party, has submitted that copy of
the revisional application has not been received by his client and prays for supply of a copy of the instant revisional application.
9.
In such circumstances, CO 2089 of 2023 is detagged from CO 85 of 2023. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)