← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/97/2024rejected

Wasimul Haque Ansari@Rehan Ansari@Jugnu@Shyam Kr Pandey@Manish@Ashish Kumar Singh@Chandan Singh@Pil v. State Of West Bengal

2024-01-15Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi (27.06.2011 - 29.08.2020),Hon'Ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen2 pages

15.01.2024 cm/ct 28 C.R.M (DB) 97 of 2024 Sl. 67 In Re : An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in Sessions Case No. 68 of 2022 arising out of Raniganj Police Station Case No. 97 of 2022 dated 20.02.2022 under Sections 457/326/395/397/307/412/365/511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Sections 25/27/35 of the Arms Act (Corresponding to G.R. No. 569 of 2022).

And In Re : Wasimul Haque Ansari @ Rehan Ansari @ Jugnu @ Shyam Kr Pandey @ Manish @ Ashish Kumar Singh @Chandan Singh @ Pilot ..... petitioner Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kunal Ganguly .... for the Petitioner Mr. Partha Pratim Das Ms. Manasi Roy .... for the State

1. Petitioner is in custody for 485 days. He has been falsely implicated in the instant case and he prays for bail.

2. The learned lawyer for the State contends that trial has commenced.

3. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner is a member of gang of inter-state dacoits. Trial has commenced. In view of the nature of the crime and as there is high possibility of abscondence, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. We request the trial court to conclude the trial with utmost expedition and preferably within a period of two years from the next date fixed before the said Court.

5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

( Partha Sarathi Sen, J. ) ( Joymalya Bagchi, J.)