← Library
Calcutta High CourtSA/121/2003dismissed

Trilochan Mahato & ORS v. Pustam Mahato

2023-02-10Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Uday Kumar1 pages

10.02.2023 SL No.51 Court No.8 (gc) SA 121 of 2003 CAN 1 of 1999 (Old No: CAN 9218 of 1999) CAN 2 of 2000 (Old No: CAN 720 of 2000) CAN 3 of 2000 (Old No: CAN 9896 of 2000) CAN 4 of 2001 (Old No: CAN 9335 of 2001) (not in file) Trilochan Mahato & Ors.

Vs.

Pustam Mahato The appellants are not represented, nor any accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellants. In spite of having adequate notice and a peremptory order being passed for removal of defects, no attempt has been made by appellants.

In view of the report of the Assistant Registrar dated 09.02.2023 that the defects have not been removed in terms of the order dated 09.06.2011, the appeal stands dismissed for non-removal of the defects.

The applications are accordingly stand dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

L.C.R., if arrived, be sent down to the appropriate Court.

(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)