← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/166/2022allowed

Pijush Roy v. State Of West Bengal

2022-01-25Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

CRM (A) 166 of 2022 (Via Video Conference) 25.01.2022 Sl. 68 Court No.29 pg.

(Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with English Bazar Women P.S. Case No. 190 of 2021 dated 30/09/2021 under Sections 417/376/323/307/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Pijush Roy ....petitioner.

Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanmay Kumar Ghosh Ms. Sonali Bhar ...for the State.

Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents of the case diary. Considering the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the victim where she admits the relationship with the petitioner and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the

petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation and that he shall appear before the jurisdictional Court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail being CRM(A) 166 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)