← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/166/2026allowed

Tarannum Kamal And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

2026-02-04Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta2 pages

27.04.2026 Court No.28 Item No.368 ssi CRM (A) 166 of 2026 With CRAN 1 of 2026 In Re: - An application for relaxation of condition of anticipatory bail. And In the matter of: Tarannum Kamal & another.

.... Petitioners.

Mr. Debajyoti Deb Mr. Somdyuti Parekh ...for the petitioners Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Abhinaba Mukherjee ...for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. By an order dated 04.02.2026 passed in CRM (A) 166 of 2026, the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail, inter alia, on the condition to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local. However, the petitioners have not been able to arrange for local sureties. Heard the learned counsel for the State.

It appears that the petitioners have not been able to arrange for local sureties and consequently could not avail of the benefit of the order granting anticipatory bail.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the condition to furnish local sureties is waived. Instead the petitioners shall be permitted to furnish registered sureties. The other conditions for granting anticipatory bail shall remain the same. With these observations and directions, the application being CRAN 1 of 2026 is disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)