Jahir Sk v. State Of West Bengal

06.02.2026 Court No.35.

D/L.65.

Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 163 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station case no. 1275 of 2024 dated 16.11.2024 under Sections 179/180/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Jahir Sk.

......Petitioner.

Ms. Minati Gomes Mr. Kazi Mokhlasur Rahman Mr. Partha Sarathi Mishra ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Imran Ali Ms. Paulami Bose ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for one year three months and the accusations against the present petitioner is for alleged recovery of 100 pieces of Rs.500/- denomination stated to be FICN. It has also been contended that similarly placed accused person has already granted anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that another accused person is absconding which has contributed to the delay. The case has already been committed to the Court of Sessions and if the petitioner is released on bail the whole of the trial would be jeopardized.

I have taken into account the materials available in the Case Diary and the stage of the case and charges are yet to be framed. Accordingly, I direct the learned trial Court that if all the accused persons are not available it would exhaust the process of law and

proceed with the consideration of charges so far as the present petitioner is concerned.

At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 163 of 2026 is dismissed.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)