Hasina Khatun And ORS v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR

14.01.2025 sdas Allowed C.R.M. (A) No. 124 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Khargram Police Station Case No. 69 of 2024 dated 28.02.2024 under Sections 341/325/326/307/354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Hasina Khatun & Ors. ..... petitioners Mr. Manas Kumar Das Mr. Aritra Kumar Thokdar .....for the petitioners Ms. Sukanya Bhattacharya Mr. Debarshi Brahma ....for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits there is a civil dispute pending between the parties. They have been falsely implicated. They pray for anticipatory bail. 2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produces case diary.

3. We have considered the materials on record. Civil proceedings are pending between the parties. Petitioners are the women folk in the family. Though report shows grievous injuries, allegations against the petitioners are general and omnibus. Possibility of false implication cannot be ruled out. Accordingly, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 15 th of January 2025 05:21:14 PM

Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and on condition that they shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 15 th of January 2025 05:21:14 PM