← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/192/2025rejected

Uttam Pati v. State Of West Bengal

2025-02-24Hon'Ble Justice Arijit Banerjee,Hon'Ble Justice Apurba Sinha Ray2 pages

55.

24-02-2025 CRM (DB) 192 of 2025 (ct. no.29) S. De (Rejected) In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as amended under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Uttam Pati.

......Petitioner.

Mr. Kallol Kr. Basu, Mr. Anindya Sundar Das, Md. Jannat Ul Firdous, Ms. Paromita Mondal, ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Suman De, Ms. D. Das, ......for the State.

Dictated by Apurba Sinha Ray, J.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody for about 1 year. He has got a lesson for his conduct. Other accused persons have already been granted bail. If the petitioner is enlarged on bail, he may abide by all the conditions that may be imposed upon him.

2. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioner absconded for 6 years. On earlier two occasions, the bail prayers were rejected by this Court. Due to his absconsion, the prosecution suffered a lot in proceeding with the case. If the petitioner is again enlarged on bail, the prosecution may suffer seriously.

3. We have considered the materials-on-record. We have also found that on earlier occasion, the bail prayers of the present petitioner were rejected. The conduct of the petitioner does not inspire us to enlarge him on bail.

4. In view of the materials-on-record, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

5. CRM (DB) 192 of 2025 is dismissed.

(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)