← Library
Calcutta High CourtSA/495/1994dismissed for default

Sushil Kumar Neogy & ANR v. Dipak Kr. Dutta

2025-02-06Hon'Ble Justice Aniruddha Roy2 pages

176 06.02.2025 Ct. no.2 Moumita SA 495 OF 1994 ------------- Sushil Kumar Neogy & Anr.

Vs.

Sri Dipak Kr. Dutta Mr. Indranil Ganguly ....For the Respondents None appears for the appellants.

The records shows on September 27, 2024 Mr.

Anirban Roy, learned Advocate appears for the appellants.

Mr. Indranil Ganguly, learned advocate appears for the respondents.

The previous orders dated July 26, 2024 and September 27, 2024 speaks for themselves.

The department reports dated January 30, 2025 shows despite there being repeated opportunity granted, the appellants has not taken any steps in the matter. The paper books have not yet been filed within time frame directed by this court.

In view of the above, the instant second appeal S.A. 495 of 1994 stands dismissed for default, without any order as to costs.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

The Trial Court record, if arrived before this court shall be returned before the jurisdictional Trial Court

forthwith but positively within a period of two months from date.

(Aniruddha Roy, J.)