← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/212/2022allowed

Najibul Molla And ANR v. The State Of West Bengal

2022-01-25Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

25.01.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 212 of 2022 (through Video conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Minakhanman Police Station Case No. 271 of 2021 dated 16.09.2021 under Sections 341/323/325/308/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Najibul Molla & Anr.

...... petitioners Mr. Ranjan Saha ....for the petitioners Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee ....for the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report.

Considering the injury report and considering the materials in the case diary, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the

petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional court on every date fixed and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)