Charan Saren @ Mana Saren @ Charan Soren v. State Of West Bengal

22.02.2021 Item no.06 Court No.28 Avijit Mitra C.R.M. 360 of 2021 (through video conference) In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Bankura GRPS Case No.04 of 2020 dated March 10, 2020 under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code;

And In re: Charan Saren @ Mana Saren @ Charan Soren ... petitioner Mr. Navonil De, Mr. Rajeswar Chakraborty ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Mr. Dipankar Pramanick ...for the State.

The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. The entire matter is based on circumstantial evidence. There are no materials on record disclosing the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence. Upon completion of investigation chargesheet has also been filed and as such further detention of the petitioner, who is in custody for more than 212 days, is not necessary. Mr. Sur, learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the petitioner's prayer and draws our attention to several documents in the case diary.

Having heard the learned advocates and considering the materials in the case diary, the gravity of the offence, its ramification and the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence, we are not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, at this stage.

However the learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. With the above observation, the application being C.R.M. 360 of 2021 is disposed of.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)