← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/195/2026allowed

Oindrila Majumder Guha @ Oindrila Guha Majumder And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

2026-02-06Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta2 pages

06.02.2026 Ct. No. 28 Sl. No.18 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (A) 195 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 13.01.2026 in connection with Contai Police Station Case No.421 of 2025 dated 10.07.2025 under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/115(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. (G.R. Case No. 1701 of 2025) And In Re: Oindrila Majumder Guha @ Oindrila Guha Majumder & Anr. ... ... Petitioners Sk. Zubair Ahmed ... ... for the petitioners Mr. Iqbal Kabir Ms. Rituparna Saha ... ... for the State 1.

Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2.

Perused the case diary.

3.

Considering the materials available in the case diary including the statements of witnesses and the injury report, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required in this case and I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.

In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on further condition that the petitioners shall cooperate with investigation and shall not threaten and/or intimidate witnesses. Petitioner no.1 shall meet the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till submission of the report in final form. 5.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

6.

Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)