← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/228/2022allowed

Serina Bibi@Selina Bibi v. State Of West Bengal

2022-01-27Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

27.01.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 228 of 2022 (through Video conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Palashipara Police Station Case No. 278 of 2019 dated 15.11.2019 under Sections 498A/302/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Serina Bibi @ Selina bibi ...... petitioner Mr. Asraf Mondal ....for the petitioner Mr. Tanmoy Kumar Ghosh Ms. Sonali Bhar ....for the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, two other co-accused were granted anticipatory bail. He submits that, the petitioner stands in the same footing as that of the other two co-accused.

Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that, the petitioner is the second wife of the husband of the deceased. The petitioner was present at the time of the incident. The petitioner cannot claim parity as that of the other co-accused granted anticipatory bail.

Considering the materials in the case diary and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are of the view that the petitioner can

claim herself to be on a different footing than that of the husband of the deceased and can justifiably claim parity with that of the other co-accused granted anticipatory bail. Consequently, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional court on every date fixed and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)