← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/157/2026allowed

Jillar Rahaman @ Jillar Sk @ Jilar Rahaman v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2026-02-05Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

05.02.2026 Court No.35.

D/L.36.

Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 157 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Domkal Police Station case no. 253 of 2023 dated 13.04.2023 under Sections 376D of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of : Jillar Rahaman @ Jillar Sk @ Jilar Rahaman. ......Petitioner.

Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Avik Ghosh Ms. Debolina Roy ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Anwar Hossain Ms. P. Priyadarshee ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 4 months 20 days and it has been informed that the case has proceeded and charges have already been framed, rest of the accused persons are in custody. Petitioner's name was initially not appearing in the application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure which was treated to be the First Information Report of the instant case, subsequently, petitioner's name has surfaced in the statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the Statement of the victim under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.

I have taken into account the overall circumstances, and I am of the view that so far as the present petitioner is concerned he is not similarly situated. Having regard to the same, I am of the

opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Thus, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, petitioner namely, Jillar Rahaman @ Jillar Sk @ Jilar Rahaman shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Murshidabad at Berhampore.

If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned trial Court in seisin of the case and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Murshidabad without the prior permission of the learned Special Court. Accordingly, the application for bail being CRM (M) No. 157 of 2026 is allowed.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)