M/S. Brindavan Construction v. The Howrah Municipal Corporation & ORS

18.12.2020 Item No. 237 Ct. No.4 PG W.P.A. 257 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) r M/s. Brindavan Construction & Anr.

Vs.

The Howrah Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Chakraborty Mr. Amal Kr. Banerjee.......for petitioners Mr. Sandipan Banerjee Mr. Ankit Surekha.......for Howrah Municipal Corporation Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioners and submits, the Corporation be directed to allow petitioners to submit a fresh plan for sanction regarding construction of new godown. Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appears on behalf of the Corporation and submits, a plan has been submitted but required space has not been allowed in it. 8 meters instead of 9 is provided in the plan. If a fresh plan with 9 meters required space is submitted and if everything else is as per the rules, his client will sanction the plan. Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate for petitioners submits, his clients will put in a fresh plan leaving the required space.

Petitioners will submit fresh plan to the Corporation with their undertaking to not proceed with or withdraw the earlier plan submitted. The

Corporation will consider the matter of sanction on the new plan within four weeks from its submission. The Corporation will inform petitioners within that time regarding fate of the plan. If it is not to be sanctioned, petitioners should be told the reason why.

Writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha, J.)