Calcutta High CourtFMA/1931/2005dismissed

Uttam Das & ORS v. The State

2024-05-02Hon'Ble Justice Arijit Banerjee,Hon'Ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas2 pages

02. 02.05.2024 Court No.6 (Tanmoy) FMA/1931/2005 WITH IA NO: CAN/1/2004(Old No: CAN/8591/2004), CAN/2/2005(Old No: CAN/450/2005), CAN/3/2005(Old No: CAN/451/2005), CAN/4/2005(Old No: CAN/452/2005), CAN/5/2005(Old No:

CAN/453/2005), CAN/6/2005(Old No: CAN/810/2005), CAN/7/2005(Old No: CAN/1257/2005), CAN/8/2005(Old No: CAN/1258/2005), CAN/10/2005(Old No:

CAN/10553/2005), CAN/11/2005(Old No:

CAN/10554/2005) UTTAM DAS & ORS.

VS THE STATE [FILE NOT HERE] This is an old appeal of 2004. None of the parties has taken any step for hearing of this matter. The department is unable to trace the records, as we are informed by the learned Registrar (IT), High Court, Calcutta, by his report dated April 16, 2024. The matter has been listed at our instance.

Today, in the first call, nobody appeared for the parties. In the second call also, nobody appears. No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the appeal being FMA/1931/2005 is dismissed along with the connected applications being IA NO:

CAN/1/2004(Old No:

CAN/8591/2004), CAN/2/2005(Old No: CAN/450/2005), CAN/3/2005(Old No:

CAN/451/2005), CAN/4/2005 (Old No:

CAN/452/2005), CAN/5/2005(Old No: CAN/453/2005), CAN/6/2005(Old No: CAN/810/2005), CAN/7/2005

(Old No:

CAN/1257/2005),CAN/8/2005(Old No:

CAN/1258/2005), CAN/10/2005(Old No:

CAN/10553/2005), CAN/11/2005(Old No:

CAN/10554/2005).

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

If in future the appellants approach the Court for recall of this order and for hearing of the appeal, then the records of the case may have to be reconstructed. (Arijit Banerjee, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)