← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/395/2021rejected

Mir Juman Ali v. State Of West Bengal

2021-01-22Hon'Ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

22.01.2021 Court No.28 Item No. 45 Krishnendu Bail Rejected CRM 395 of 2021 (Via video Conference) In Re:- An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ;

And In Re : Mir Jumman Ali Petitioner Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick For the Petitioner Mr. Neguive Ahmed Mrs. Trina Mitra For the State The present application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner in connection with Mothabari Police Station Case No. 187 of 2020 dated 19.05.2020 under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. There is no direct allegation against the petitioner in the complaint. The prime accused, namely, Mir Afrul Ali, is in custody. Upon completion of investigation, charge sheet has also been filed and as such further detention of the petitioner, who is in custody for 246 days, is not necessary, The learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that out of the seven accused persons, five are absconding till date and there are materials on

record disclosing the involvement of the petitioner. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and considering the materials in the case diary, the gravity of the offence and the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

Accordingly, the application for bail, being CRM No. 395 of 2020, is dismissed.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J)