← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/160/2025allowed

Kanika Mukherjee v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-02-05Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Subhendu Samanta2 pages

05.02.2025 sdas Allowed C.R.M. (A) No. 160 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Bongaon Police Station Case No. 978 of 2024 dated 26.10.2024 under Sections 318(4)/316(2)/108/3(5) of the BNS. And In Re : Kanika Mukherjee ..... petitioner Mr. Susnigdho Bhattacharyya Ms. Sarmistha De .....for the petitioner Mr. Debobrata Chatterjee Mr. Nirupam Dhali ....for the State 1.

Heard the learned advocates for the parties.

2.

We have considered the materials on record.

Petitioner is the mother of the principal accused. Though petitioner is named in the suicide note primary allegation of receipt of money is against her son who is in custody. Under such circumstances we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

3. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and on condition that she shall Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 7 th of February 2025 04:52:07 PM

appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

4. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Subhendu Samanta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 7 th of February 2025 04:52:07 PM