← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/149/2024allowed

Sk.Maidul @ Sk. Maidul Rahaman v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2024-01-25Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

25.01.2024 Ct. No. 29 S.D.

Allowed C.R.M.(A) 149 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nandakumar Police Station Case No. 384 of 2023 dated 28.09.2023 under Sections 448/341/354/323/506 of the Indian penal Code added with Sections 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re: Sk. Maidul @ Sk. Maidul Rahaman ...... petitioner Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta ....for the petitioner Mr. Apurba Kumar Dutta ...for the State Mr. Salil Kumar Maiti Ms. Pinki Saha ....for the respondent Police filed charge sheet.

Injury report of the victim suggests that there was an assault on the victim.

Charge sheet is one of attempt to rape her apart from other charges.

Considering the materials in the case diary and the nature of the offence, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner shall appear on every date before the Jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)