← Library
Calcutta High CourtFA/98/2011dismissed as not pressed

Arnab Gupta v. Anamika Gupta ( Das)

2022-08-23Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury1 pages

FA 98 of 2011 Item-1.

23-08-2022 Arnab Gupta

Versus

Anamika Gupta (Das) sg Ct. 8 Mr. Debabrata Ray, Adv.

Mr. Sarbani Mukhopadhyay, Adv.

... appellant Mr. Debabrata Ray, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant, on instruction, has submitted that the appellant is not willing to proceed with the appeal.

An original letter of instruction dated 10th August, 2022 addressed to Mr. Ray by Mr. Arnab Gupta, the appellant, is produced to that effect and the same is taken on record. Under such circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Leave is given to Mr. Ray to file his vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant by tomorrow.

Consequent upon filing of the vakalatnama, the name of the erstwhile advocate-on-record shall stand deleted and substituted by Mr. Ray.

LCR, if lying with this Court, may be sent down to the learned court below.

(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)