← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/219/2023allowed

Rousanara Begum@Rosan Ara v. State Of West Bengal

2023-01-18Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

18.01.2023 Serial no. 14 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) Allowed) CRM (A) 219 of 2023 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Uluberia Women Police Station Case No. 94 of 2022 dated 01.10.2022 under Sections 498A/323/354/326/307/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Rousanara Begum @ Rosan Ara ... ... Petitioner Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhuri, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy, Ms. Sima Biswas, Advocates ... ...For the State The claim for parity with other co-accuseds who were enlarged on anticipatory bail by the order dated December 22, 2022 passed in CRM (A) 5955 of 2022 is not being disputed on behalf of the State.

In such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigations till its conclusion and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused

and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. CRM (A) 219 of 2023 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)