← Library
Calcutta High CourtFMAT/31/2021dismissed

Smt Pratima Roy v. Hindusta Unilever Ltd

2022-09-14Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Uday Kumar2 pages

FMAT 31 of 2021 Item-4.

CAN 1 of 2021 14-09-2022 Smt. Pratima Roy

Versus

Hindustan Unilever Ltd.

sg Ct. 8 Mr. Arun Kumar Upadhyay, Adv.

...for the appellant Mr. Ayush Jain, Adv.

Ms. Arti Bhattacharyya, Adv.

...for the respondent This appeal has been assigned to this Bench by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice by an Administrative Notice dated 9th September, 2022.

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has produced a photostat copy of the order dated 11th May, 2022 from which it appears that the suit was dismissed for default on non-compliance of Courts orders.

In view thereof, this appeal has now become infructuous and the appeal, accordingly, stands dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed solely on the ground that the suit is dismissed for default in the meantime.

In view of the dismissal of the appeal, the connected application being CAN 1 of 2021 is also stand dismissed. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the case.

A photostat copy of the order dated 11th May, 2022 produced by the learned Counsel for the respondent is taken on record.

(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)