Pankaj Yadav And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

27.01.2022 Serial no.53 Aloke (Through Video Conference) Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 329 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 19.01.2022 in connection with Bhadreswar Police Station Case No. 320 of 2021 dated 15.08.2021 under Sections 341/326/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Pankaj Yadav & Ors.

... ...Petitioners Mr. Suman Chakraborty, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Ms. Faria Hossain, Advocate Ms. Sonali Das, Advocate ... ... For the State Mr. Dipayan Kundu, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that since the police filed charge-sheet custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not required.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report and the fact that the injured was hospitalized for 21 days.

The de facto complainant is represented.

Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and with a further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below on every date fixed for hearing.

The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM (A) 329 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)