Sk. Soidul Ali v. Sabur Ali Mallick

11.11.2022 Court No.12 Item no.25 B.M.J.R C.O 155 of 2020 Sk. Soidul Ali Vs.

Sabur Ali Mallick None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call. It reveals that on the earlier occasions i.e. on 04.11.2022 and 10.11.2022 the petitioner was also absent. It appears to this Court that probably the petitioner as such is not interested in the matter. In view of such, the revisional application is dismissed for default.

Interim order, if therebe any, hereby stands vacated.

(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)