Sainu Mia And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

CRM (A) 356 of 2022 (Via Video Conference) 27.01.2022 Sl. 74 Court No.29 suvayan (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bhutni P.S. Case No. 184 of 2021 dated 04/11/2021 under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Sainu Mia & Ors.

....petitioners.

Mr. Amitabha Karmakar ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Tanmoy Kr. Ghosh Ms. Sonali Bhar ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that the husband was arrested and granted bail by the jurisdictional Court.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents of the case diary. Considering the fact that the husband was granted bail by the jurisdictional Court and considering the involvement of the petitioners in the incident, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 will report before the Investigating Officer

once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and petitioner nos. 3 and 4 will cooperate with the investigation and shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on the dates fixed for trial and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date. The application for anticipatory bail being CRM(A) 356 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)