← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/368/2022allowed

Jainul @ Zianuddin v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2022-02-02Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

02.02.2022 Serial no. 11 Dd (Through Video Conference) CRM (A) 368 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Goalpokher Police Station Case No. 119 of 2020 dated 20.04.2020 under Sections 448 /341 /323 /325 /326 /307 / 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Jainul @ Zainuddin ... Petitioner Mr. Nazar Chowdhury, Ms. Priyanka Saha, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Iqbal Kabir, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that six other co-accused including the principal accused was granted anticipatory bail by the jurisdictional Court. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report and the contents in the case diary.

Considering the fact that the police filed charge sheet and considering that the other co-accused are on anticipatory bail, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and

on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on every date fixed for hearing.

Prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM (A) 368 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)