← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/290/2023allowed

Mrityunjay Dey v. State Of West Bengal

2023-01-20Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

20.01.2023 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 290 of 2023 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bishnupur Police Station Case No. 236 of 2022 dated 01.11.2022 under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Mrityunjay Dey ...... petitioner Mr. Joy Chakraborty Mr. K. S. Alam Mr. Sandip Dinda ....for the petitioner Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Partha Pratim Das Ms. Eshita Dutta ....for the State The husband is in custody.

Apparently, the victim committed suicide.

Other co-accuseds were enlarged on anticipatory bail by the order dated December 19, 2022 passed in CRM(A) 5863 of 2022.

The allegation as against the petitioner appears to be omnibus and general in nature.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)