Hayad Ali And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

07.04.2021 Item No.56 Ct.No.28 Subha rejected C.R.M. 656 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr. P.C inconnection with Raiganj P. S. Case No. 17 of 2020 dated 2501-2020 punishable under Sections 341/376/109/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Hayad Ali and Anr. ... Petitioners. Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury Mr. Sabyasachi Hazra ... For the Petitioners.

Mr. Sandip Chakraborty ... For the State.

The present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the petitioners in connection with Raiganj Police Station Case No.

of dated 25-01-2020 under Sections 341/376/109/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.2 has already been arrested in the meantime and, therefore, the instant application has

become infructuous so far as the said petitioner is concerned.

However, learned advocate for the petitioners on instruction submits that petitioner no.1 does not intend to proceed with the instant application for anticipatory bail and seeks for withdrawal of the application for anticipatory bail. In view of the above, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed so far as the petitioner no.1 is concerned as withdrawn.

(Harish Tandon, J.) (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)