← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (NDPS)/169/2024rejected

Md Asif Ansari @ Chotu v. State Of West Bengal

2024-02-01Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

01.02.2024 sdas rejected C.R.M.(NDPS) No. 169 of 2024 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kulti Police Station Case No. 423 of 2021 dated 23.08.2021 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c )/29 of the NDPS Act.

And In Re : Md. Asif Ansari @ Chotu .... petitioner Mr. Ayan Basu Sk. Salim Mr. Sumit Routh ....for the petitioner Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty ... for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits he is in custody for two years and six months. It is also submitted there is delay in trial. He prays for bail. He submits supplementary affidavit in support of his plea. Let supplementary affidavit be kept with record.

2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the bail prayer and submits report. Let the report be kept with record. 3.

We have considered the materials on record.

Narcotics above commercial quantity i.e. 21 Kgs. of Ganja was recovered from the joint possession of the petitioner and coaccused. Petitioner was apprehended at the spot. Subsequently co-accused were apprehended and as their complicity had transpired from the statement of other accused before police officer they were enlarged on bail. Bail prayer of the petitioner

was rejected on merits in July, 2023. Trial has already commenced and one witness had been examined. Thereafter as per order-sheet placed before us it appears on two dates coaccused who are on bail did not appear and warrant of arrest was issued against him. In view of the aforesaid state of affairs as one of the accused who was enlarged on bail had absconded we are of the opinion it is likely that the petitioner, if released on bail, may also abscond. Under such circumstances, we do not wish to grant bail to him at present.

4. Application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)