← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/231/2026dismissed

Naren Ghosh v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2026-03-25Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

D/L40 25.03.2026 Bpg.

Dismissed C.R.M. (M) 231 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as amended /under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Malda Police Station Case No.532 of 2023 dated 06.09.2023 under Sections 376AB/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act; Naren Ghosh

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Mr. Amitabha Karmakar Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Nirupam Dhali.

...for the State.

Mr. Amit Halder Mr. Amit Roy.

...for the de facto complainant.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 280 days and the evidence of the victim being over, further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.

Learned advocate for the State submits that the petitioner had been evading the process of law for a considerable period of time. There are other vulnerable witnesses to be examined in this case.

Learned advocate for the de facto complainant is present and opposes the prayer for bail.

Having considered the materials which are appearing against the present petitioner and the deposition of the victim before

the learned trial court, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage.

Accordingly, CRM(M)231 of 2026 is dismissed at this stage.

Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)