← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/232/2024dismissed as rejected

Acheruddin Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

2024-01-30Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

30.01.2024 13 & 22 Ct. No. 29 S.D.

REJECTED C.R.M.(A) 232 of 2024 In Re : Acheruddin Mondal ...... petitioner With C.R.M. (A) 241 of 2024 In re: Gafur Mondal @ Goffur & Ors.

....petitioners In Re:- In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Krishnaganj Police Station Case No. 382 of 2023 dated 24.09.2023 under Section 498A/306/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Mr. Prabir Majumder ...for the petitioners Ms. Sonali Das ...for the State in C.R.M. (A) 232 of 2024 Mr. Sujan Chatterjee ...for the State in C.R.M. (A) 241 of 2024 Leave is granted to the learned advocate for the petitioner in C.R.M.(A) 232 of 2024 to correct the cause title. Two applications for anticipatory bail are taken up for consideration as they emanate at the same police station case. Petitioner in C.R.M. (A) 232 of 2024 is the husband. Petitioner in C.R.M. (A) 232 of 2024 married second time. The police complaint is in relation to the second marriage. Neighbour statement available in the case diary suggests that the husband drove away the first wife after torturing and

demanding dowry from her. Husband and in-laws are meting out the same treatment so far as the present wife is concerned. Materials in the case diary suggest requirement of investigation. Enlargement of any of the petitioners on anticipatory bail will send a wrong signal to the society.

In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in both the petitions and the prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected. The applications being CRM (A) 230 of 2024 and C.R.M. (A) 241 of 2024 are dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)