← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/283/2023allowed

Umera Bibi And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2023-02-21Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

21.02.2023 Sl. No.25 [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (DB) 283 of 2023 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 17.01.2023 in connection with Bhagwangola Police Station Case No.686 of 2022 dated 29.10.2022 under Sections 498A/304B/302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

And In Re: Umera Bibi & Anr.

... Petitioners Mr. Ali Ahsan Alamgir Mr. Soumajit Das Majumder Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon ... for the petitioners Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee .. ld. Public Prosecutor Mr. Parthapratim Das Mrs. Manasi Roy ... for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody for about 114 days. Investigation is complete. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. We have considered the materials on record. Investigation is complete. Balancing the nature of accusation with the period of detention suffered by the petitioners, we are of the opinion further detention of the accuseds/petitioners is not necessary. Therefore, the accuseds/petitioners, namely (1) Umera Bibi & (2) Jinnatunnesha Bibi @ Khatun, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.

shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event they fail to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail automatically without reference to this court. The application for bail, thus, stands allowed. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)