Tapas Ghosh v. The State Of West Bengal

06.02.2025 sdas Allowed C.R.M. (A) No. 251 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Pursurah Police Station Case No. 333 of 2024 dated 20.11.2024 under Sections 126(2)/329(2)/115(2)/117(2)/76/ 351(2)/303(2)/3(5) of the BNS.

And In Re : Tapas Ghosh ..... petitioner Mr. Pradip Roy Mr. Ujjal Roy .....for the petitioner Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya ....for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits there was a land dispute between the parties. He has been falsely implicated. Accordingly, he prays for anticipatory bail. 2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3.

We have considered the materials on record including the statements of the witnesses and medical report. Allegations against the petitioner and co-accused are general and omnibus. Co-accused have been granted pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 10 th of February 2025 04:00:54 PM

Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and on condition that he shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Subhendu Samanta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 10 th of February 2025 04:00:54 PM