← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/245/2024rejected

Prasenjit Mondal @ Prosenjit Mondal v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2024-01-29Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Gaurang Kanth1 pages

29.01.2024 dd rejected C.R.M.(DB) No. 245 of 2024 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kultali Police Station Case No. 691 of 2023 dated 01.11.2023 under Sections 376 (AB) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

And In Re : Prasenjit Mondal @ Prosenjit Mondal .... Petitioner Mr. Bapin Baidya ....for the petitioner Mr. Neguive Ahmed, APP Ms. Sonali Bhar, ...... for the State

1. We have considered the materials on record.

2. Victim is a minor. Her statement implicates the petitioner in the offence of penetrative sexual assault. Victim is yet to be examined.

3. Considering the gravity of the offence, materials on record and as the vulnerable witness has not been examined, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)