Pubali Mitra Chaudhuri v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

11.02.2021 ss W.P.A. 1877 of 2021 (Through Video Conference) , Pubali Mitra Chaudhuri Vs.

State of West Bengal & ors.

,, Mr. Amitabrata Roy Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Banerjee Mr. Abhradip Maiti .... For the petitioner Mr. Biswarup Biswas Mr. Subrata Ghosh Mr. Gorachand Samanta ... For the respondent no.5 Mr. Susanta Pal ... for the State Ms. Supriya Dubey ... For the W.B.C.S.S.C.

Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharya ... For the W.B.B.S.E.

,, It appears to this Court that the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education is a necessary party in this writ proceeding and it is required to be made a partyrespondent in this proceeding. Petitioner is permitted to incorporate the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education as a party-respondent in this proceeding. Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharya, learned Counsel, who usually appears on behalf of the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, is directed to appear in this matter and the Chairman of the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education is directed to regularise her appointment.

Petitioner is directed to serve copy of the writ petition upon Mrs. Koyeli Bhattacharya.

This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the Government authorities in processing her application of mutual transfer.

Counsel for the State has handed over in court a copy of recommendation made by the Commissioner of School Education, Government of West Bengal and the same be kept with the record.

Based on this recommendation, the petitioner is satisfied and only prays that the final order of transfer may be passed by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, that is, the authority concerned.

In light of the same, West Bengal Board of Secondary Education is directed to grant the appointment within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order upon the Board.

In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of.

Since no affidavit-in-opposition is called for, allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)