Uttam Das v. Apu Das & ANR.

NB 12.07.2021 CRR 75 of 2012 (via Video Conference) Ct. No. 32 In the matter of:- Uttam Das ....petitioner Mr. Imran Ali, Mr. Nirupam Dhali.

...for the State.

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called on for hearing. No accommodation is sought. It appears that on the last three occasions i.e. on 09.12.2020, 08.07.2021 and 09.07.2021, when the matter was called on, no one represented the petitioner or prayed for any adjournment. Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)