Anamika Mal v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

jdt.

19.01.2023 jb.

W.P.A. 1893 of 2021 (Anamika Mal vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) Mr. Salil Kr. Maiti Ms. Jayatri Basu Roy Ms. Pinki Saha .... For the Petitioner Mr. Susovan Sengupta Mr. Srikanta Pal .... For the State Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

None appears for the private respondents despite service.

The petitioner's grievance is that the private respondents have raised unauthorised construction by encroaching upon a portion of the PWD Road adjoining her property, thereby obstructing her egress and ingress. The petitioner submitted a representation in this regard before the concerned authority on 8th November, 2020 which is yet to be considered. The petitioner prays for a direction upon the authority to consider the representation at the earliest.

It is submitted on behalf of the State respondents that the third respondent be directed to consider the representation, in accordance with law.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner dated

8th November, 2020 within three months from the date of communication of this order upon affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the interested persons including the petitioner and the private respondents, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is thus disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Since no affidavit has been invited, allegations contained in the writ petition shall be deemed not to have been admitted.

Urgent certified website copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)