Shymali Naskar And ORS v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

02.02.2022 Serial no.17 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 451 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 20.01.2022 in connection with Baruipur Police Station Case No. 1642 dated 18.09.2021 under Sections 420/468/471/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Shymali Naskar & Ors.

... ...Petitioners Mr. Sukdeb Sarkar, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Prasun Kr. Dutta, ld. APP Mr. Subrata Ray, Advocate ... ... For the State Mr. Ashutosh Mandal, Advocate ... ... For the de facto complainant Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the police complaint is a result of a long standing property dispute.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State refers to the case diary.

The de facto complainant is represented.

Considering the gravity of the offence, the nature of injuries and the involvement of the petitioners therein and the fact that there is property dispute between the private parties, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 will report before the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and petitioner no. 1 will cooperate with the

investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM (A) 451 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)