Sachindra Nath Maity v. Swapan Kumar Roy & ORS.

CRR 122 of 2017 In Re:- An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

And In the matter of : Sachindra Nath Maity.

...Petitioner.

None appears on behalf of the parties nor any accommodation 31.01.2024 Court No.05 Item No.04 Ab is prayed for on their behalf.

This revisional application was preferred by Sachindra Nath Maity on 12th January, 2017 under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C and first appeared for hearing on 16th January, 2017. Since 5th June, 2023 this matter is continuously appearing in the list. Repeated directions were given to the parties. However they did not appear even on last date, when the parties were directed to ensure their appearance on the adjourned date, i.e today, otherwise, necessary order would be passed on the basis of the materials available on record. Accordingly, the matter is taken up today for passing an order.

In this revisioanl application, the petitioner Sachindra Nath Maity, has prayed for setting aside of the order dated 16th December 2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Court, Contai in GR(E) Case No. 495 of 2016. By the said order the petitioner was directed to return the seized wooden logs to Swapan Kumar Roy after proper verification and upon furnishing Zimma Bond of Rs. 30,000/- with the conditions to not to change the nature and character of the seized article and to sale or dispose of the same without prior permission of the Court.

Prima facie, I do not find any merit in the instant revisional application. As such it deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly the instant revisional application along with

connected application, if any, stands dismissed. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

(Uday Kumar, J.)